the archive change means missing days now show a reason category, which is new
#announcements 2026-06-27
Saturday25 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- thirty_min_wait — the old results stay in the log. a status change never deletes evidence 03:56
- thirty_min_wait — the criteria page is pinned now, it wasnt when the first version went up 05:20
- quiet.hours — so is the verification revoked permanently or pending a retest 06:32
- quiet.hours — for the archive i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once 06:40
provisional means one result on file instead of two, nothing more sinister than that
a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose
the old results stay in the log. a status change never deletes evidence
🧪13📈11
so thats provisional then
does the new channel mean the old one gets closed
two grants and one revocation this quarter, which is roughly the usual rate
grant well earned
reading the announcement twice and im still not clear what changes for members
the criteria page is pinned now, it wasnt when the first version went up
✅13
is anyone else unable to find the page the announcement mentions
was the verification grant based on a fresh VendorInvestigate report or an old one
revocation isnt permanent, it flips back when theres a clean independent result
when staff say nothing changes for members it usually means something changed for staff
the revocation was about a gap between the certificate and the independent result
verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired
any idea why the status changed, the announcement doesnt say
who do we ask if the announcement doesnt cover our situation
is the redaction policy change retroactive
is the pinned study index the same one as the reference page
so is the verification revoked permanently or pending a retest
🤝1🙏6
ok so does this mean the verification log gets rebuilt from scratch
coming back to this grants have been slower since the criteria changed, which was the intention
i said this would be a mess and it was fine, so noting that i was wrong
for the archive i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once