does the logging change mean old days get re-rendered
#announcements 2026-06-28
Sunday23 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result
❤️1
second read helped
👍2📈15💀3
is this about all vendors or only the ones with open results
coa-e-2205.pdf
1 page · 588 KB · not retained in the public archive
follow up i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once
unexpected but ok
any idea why the status changed, the announcement doesnt say
the revocation was about a gap between the certificate and the independent result
reading it again it does say the window is 5 weeks, i just missed it first time
that answers mine
a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose
saw the log row
Archive lookup: peak_split first appears in this channel on 2025-10-21.
revoked, ouch
who do we ask if the announcement doesnt cover our situation
Verification log updated: JEEP — evidence added, status unchanged.
Inter-lab diff for lot B-0114: 98.1% vs 97.4%. Within expected range.
when they say provisional does that mean anything different in practice
GL Biochem went from verified to flagged in about 7 days which is the fastest ive seen
Assay note: QST lot F-1330 reported at 97.4% of label content.
👍1👀8
so thats provisional then
any detail coming
coming back to this status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check