coming back to this is the combination just the two dosed together or a single formulation
#cagrilintide 2025-07-26
Saturday21 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- batch_bandit — €55 for a 2 vial and it lasts me longer than the GLP-1 does at my doses its an amylin analogue, different receptor family, so treating it as another GLP-1 is the… 17:22
- plus_sixteen — i was sceptical about monotherapy and after 17 months im still sceptical, just less so, from memory the reason nausea reads differently is timing, mine arrived on the… 20:22
- plus_sixteen — two VendorInvestigate results on the same QST lot came back 99.2 and 97.4, closer than i expected 20:24
does the fullness effect fade the way appetite suppression does
different not less
monotherapy question, did appetite move for you without a GLP-1 alongside
i titrated over twice as many weeks as i did on semaglutide and that was right for me
€55 for a 2 vial and it lasts me longer than the GLP-1 does at my doses
its an amylin analogue, different receptor family, so treating it as another GLP-1 is the first mistake
nobody should copy my schedule, im describing it because people asked what a slow ramp looks like, still working it out
20 in 1ml gives 10mg/ml which is what i use, purely because the units come out round
i titrated over twice as many weeks as i did on semaglutide and that was right for me, still working it out
amylin analogue, so its not a GLP-1 at all right
separate days
peptidemeter-summary-a-2601.pdf
2 pages · 929 KB · not retained in the public archive
how slow are people titrating this compared to tirzepatide
the nausea felt different rather than less, more fullness and less of the queasy wave
monotherapy was underwhelming for me and i say that as someone who wanted it to work
*that should say weekly
the fullness effect hasnt faded over 26 months, unlike my semaglutide appetite curve
[edited]underwhelming honestly
amylin not glp-1
weekly for me, same day every week, no reason beyond habit
the combination is the thing with trial data behind it, monotherapy in here is mostly us guessing
📈2
i was sceptical about monotherapy and after 17 months im still sceptical, just less so, from memory
the reason nausea reads differently is timing, mine arrived on the second day rather than the first
two VendorInvestigate results on the same QST lot came back 99.2 and 97.4, closer than i expected