vialroom

#dosing-titration 2025-03-28

Friday44 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • blind_submit — with a roughly seven day half-life you are near steady state after about five weeks at a dose came down from a treatment dose to maintenance over about three months… 18:11
  • VialBot — Testing queue: 3 submissions open, 74 awaiting dispatch. 18:55
  • VialBot — Verification log updated: MKM — evidence added, status unchanged. 19:40
  • plateau_pen — i drifted from sunday to wednesday over a year and only noticed when i checked the log 21:08
BS

you do not have to escalate at all. that is a real option that gets forgotten

too early imo

BS

with a roughly seven day half-life you are near steady state after about five weeks at a dose
came down from a treatment dose to maintenance over about three months and it was uneventful

🙏11💀1

slightly off topic but i jumped a rung once to catch up after a supply gap and it was a bad week. would not repeat

i went from 10 to 1.7 and honestly could not tell the difference in appetite

split dosing has no trial behind it. people here do it and report on it, thats all

HH

appetite returning at the end of the week is extremely common and is not the dose failing

VB

Assay note: JEEP lot C-4402 reported at 99% of label content.

slightly off topic but is there any actual reason to escalate every 4 weeks other than the trial did it

WT

if you are asking whether to go up, the fact you are asking usually means not yet

VB

Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2601. Nothing logged either way.

WT

the argument for splitting is a flatter curve. the argument against is you have doubled your injections for a guess

VB

Testing queue: 3 submissions open, 74 awaiting dispatch.

👀7📉15
NP

came down from a treatment dose to maintenance over about three months and it was uneventful

HH

after a gap of more than about three weeks i restart one rung lower. thats my own rule, not advice
came down from a treatment dose to maintenance over about three months and it was uneventful

follow up stepping back down on purpose is a completely reasonable move and this channel should say so more often

MC

if i took it 7 days late do i shift the schedule or go back to the old day

dose day drift is mostly harmless with a weekly compound, but pick a day and defend it

BS

follow up how do you tell a plateau from just being at your set point
plateau versus set point is not answerable in under six months of data

VB

Verification log updated: MKM — evidence added, status unchanged.

❤️8🎉2
MC

has anyone gone up and then straight back down and been glad they tried

U-100 syringe: 1 unit = 0.01 ml
  10u = 0.10 ml
  25u = 0.25 ml
  50u = 0.50 ml
 100u = 1.00 ml
mg drawn = ml drawn x mg/ml
NW

pick a day and stick to it

coa-a-2418.pdf
1 page · 130 KB · not retained in the public archive
RR

i went to the top of the ladder, felt no better than two rungs down, and came back. that is data for me and nobody else

update from 26 months ago: held at the same dose the whole time and still losing slowly

MC

if it "stopped working after four days" that is almost never pharmacokinetics

MC

holding is not failing. most people here who lasted two years held at least one dose for months

RR

coming back to this is it normal for appetite to come back at the end of the week

MC

the honest answer is that most of us are running protocols nobody has ever studied

i escalate on symptoms. if the current dose is still doing something i stay on it

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance

i drifted from sunday to wednesday over a year and only noticed when i checked the log

👀10❤️3😂3

half life is a week

📈2

whats your rule for when a side effect means hold rather than push

[edited]

right so do you count from injection day or from when you actually felt it

NW

i log dose, day, weight and one line about how the week felt. thats enough to make decisions on

[edited]