shallow gradient
#hplc-massspec 2025-07-05
- acetate_ash — baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase 15:33
- gradient_greg — follow up my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean 15:34
- hk_hplc — update on the earlier thing how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity 16:20
- VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 93 messages from 28 members. 16:30
- salt_bridge — whats a plus one dalton shift usually 19:01
deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant
the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much
does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely
plus 16 is oxidation
baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase
follow up my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean
need more sample
update on the earlier thing is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides
ms/ms or it isnt identity
integration difference
214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics, take that with a pinch of salt
thats a charge state
update on the earlier thing whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent
update on the earlier thing how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity
baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column
i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer
Channel stats, last 30 days: 93 messages from 28 members.
Channel stats, last 30 days: 63 messages from 53 members.
i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state
follow up i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column
Channel stats, last 30 days: 85 messages from 43 members.
if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic, ill dig out the number
i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column
retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily
whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size
a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information
is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question
retention time is a hint
for the archive coming back after 25 months, what changed in how you read these
for the archive semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2, ymmv
why does integration change the number so much
i asked Medutest for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question
nobody runs enough blanks, including me
if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks, ask me again in a month
how do you spot a deletion in a sequence from mass alone
[edited]how do you tell co-elution from a clean single peak
show me the spectrum
genuine question plus sixteen, is that always oxidation
unrelated but how would a truncation sequence show up
[edited]does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is
if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result
whats a plus one dalton shift usually
monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting
ask for the trace
has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong
Recon calculator: 5mg in 5ml = 4mg/ml.
is a tailing factor of anything specific a problem
genuine question integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance
plus 0.98 is deamidation
peak RRT area% note
1 0.42 0.31 solvent front
2 0.88 0.44 related substance
3 1.00 98.72 main
4 1.14 0.53 related substancewhy do two labs integrate the same peak differently