vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2025-07-06

Sunday19 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • assay_not_purity — a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see 21:13
  • ms_ms_mira — has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong 21:26
  • ms_ms_mira — a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 12 days at ambient does 21:38
  • karl_fischer — update from 21 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything 21:54
  • LC_MS_Lena — while im here is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question 22:00

a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see

thats the solvent peak

nobody runs enough blanks, including me

retention time is a hint

ask for the trace

MM

has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong

📈2💀211
MM

a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 12 days at ambient does

chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 827 KB · not retained in the public archive
👀6
KF

baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase

KF

update from 21 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything

ms/ms or it isnt identity

LM

while im here is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question

LM

how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity

my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean

*that should say weekly