why does integration change the number so much
#hplc-massspec 2025-12-03
- apob_over_ldl — does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely 22:26
- HPLC_Hank — how do you spot a deletion in a sequence from mass alone 22:43
- drawup_dee — baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase 22:55
- HPLC_Hank — while im here a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 11 days at ambient does 23:00
retention time is a hint
does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely
my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean
baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column
integration difference
whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size
nobody runs enough blanks, including me
[edited]is a tailing factor of anything specific a problem
how do you spot a deletion in a sequence from mass alone
genuine question is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates
coming back after 11 months, what changed in how you read these
is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question
oxidation is about plus 15.99 Da and is usually methionine or tryptophan
*Janoshik not the other one
baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase
the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much, i could be wrong
update on the earlier thing a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information, anyway
while im here a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 11 days at ambient does
M = 4113.6
[M+2H]2+ = (4113.6 + 2.02) / 2 = 2057.8
[M+3H]3+ = (4113.6 + 3.02) / 3 = 1372.2
observed 1372.3 -> consistenthow do you tell co-elution from a clean single peak
ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial
whats the void volume peak, is that always solvent
shallow gradient
plus sixteen, is that always oxidation
i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state
[edited]you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it, still working it out
if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic
thats a charge state
[edited]thats the solvent peak
why do two labs integrate the same peak differently
how would a truncation sequence show up
i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column