vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-06-19

Friday20 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • border_force_bex — co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding 17:59
  • border_force_bex — how would a truncation sequence show up 18:51
  • VialBot — Testing queue: 4 submissions open, 55 awaiting dispatch. 19:25
  • drawup_dee — i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer 19:31
  • drawup_dee — is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates 20:43
TE

is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question

BF

co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding

📈3❤️10

whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size

[edited]
TE

follow up you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it, thats one data point

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result

my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean

TE

i asked PeptideMeter for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question

VB

Testing queue: 4 submissions open, 55 awaiting dispatch.

DD

ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column

i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer

📉6

relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not, i have it written down somewhere

DD

deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant

a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information, i have it written down somewhere

is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates

❤️8🔥6👀1