need more sample
#hplc-massspec 2026-06-20
- a1c_lag — i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column 22:13
- auckland_aliquot — i asked VendorInvestigate for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question 22:50
- auckland_aliquot — semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2 23:28
is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides
thats co-elution
follow up ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial
thats a charge state
plus 0.98 is deamidation
plus 16 is oxidation
[edited]the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent
update on the earlier thing a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see, thats just me
[edited]does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is
if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result, thats just me
baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column
i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column
214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics
if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic
thats the solvent peak
update on the earlier thing relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not
i asked VendorInvestigate for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question
for the archive i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer
semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2
the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much