vialroom

#lab-requests 2025-01-19

Sunday23 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • bea_reconstitutes — quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not 22:09
  • LC_MS_Lena — including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process 22:25
  • VialBot — Assay note: WXT lot E-2205 reported at 98.6% of label content. 22:37
NE

if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer

update on the earlier thing the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive

sorry to jump in whats the current turnaround, last one took 12 days

EE

update from 20 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine, anyway

BR

quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not

🎉3❤️123
LM

how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial

📈2📉2🎉5

how many people do we need before the split is worth it

HL

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup

VB

Assay note: WXT lot E-2205 reported at 98.6% of label content.

LM

send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it

NE

declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing

slightly off topic but i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones

queue is posted