how are we splitting the cost this time
#lab-requests 2025-01-19
- bea_reconstitutes — quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not 22:09
- LC_MS_Lena — including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process 22:25
- VialBot — Assay note: WXT lot E-2205 reported at 98.6% of label content. 22:37
code not name
if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer
keep half back
update on the earlier thing the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive
sorry to jump in whats the current turnaround, last one took 12 days
update from 20 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine, anyway
quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch
how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process
how many people do we need before the split is worth it
chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup
Assay note: WXT lot E-2205 reported at 98.6% of label content.
who is coordinating this round
do i send a syringe or the whole vial
send powder
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it
anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own
declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing
slightly off topic but i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones
whats the failure rate on samples actually arriving
queue is posted