are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source
#lab-requests 2025-01-25
- rezept_rolf — including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier… 19:40
- batch_bandit — send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it 20:11
- batch_bandit — how are we splitting the cost this time 20:21
how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
roughly one sample in 3 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally
anyone want to co-fund a quantity test on a lot i already own
label the syringe
if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer
keep half back
blinded obviously
including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process
submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust
how much sample does the lab need for purity plus quantity
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it
how are we splitting the cost this time
i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing
genuine question can i add a second lot to the same submission
[edited]is there a queue position i can check