i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing
#lab-requests 2025-06-26
Thursday19 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Archive lookup: back_from_away first appears in this channel on 2025-04-10. 18:54
- back_from_away — declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is 19:46
- VialBot — Verification log updated: WXT — evidence added, status unchanged. 19:49
- step_one_sian — if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer 20:20
powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control, we shall see
whats the wording on the customs declaration for a sample
roughly one sample in 4 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally
whats the failure rate on samples actually arriving
we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it
Archive lookup: back_from_away first appears in this channel on 2025-04-10.
coordinating this round
whats the split
turnaround has been between 6 days and twice that depending on the queue
declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
[edited]🧊3✅1💀1
a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement
Verification log updated: WXT — evidence added, status unchanged.
do we publish the raw report or a summary
*Medutest not the other one
if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer
🙏3
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch
submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust
roughly one sample in 5 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally
PeptideMeter has been the fastest for us. Janoshik has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab, take that with a pinch of salt
dont send your only vial