vialroom

#lab-requests 2026-05-03

Sunday28 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • relabel_watch — quick one PeptideMeter has been the fastest for us. Janoshik has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab 11:36
  • relabel_watch — do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt 11:41
  • nausea_window — update from 19 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine 11:42
  • nausea_window — declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is 11:58
RW

quick one PeptideMeter has been the fastest for us. Janoshik has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab

⚠️6🔥6

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup

🎉2🙏6

do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt

🔥2📉9🤝3
NW

update from 19 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine

😂7🤝1🎉2
NW

declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is

11⚠️6

quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not

coming back after 25 months, is the submission process the same

who is coordinating this round

do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder

PS

i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests

coordinating this round

a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial

13:30marrow.mod pinned a message to this channel
EE

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control

EE

send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it

LM

submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust

do i send a syringe or the whole vial

TF

how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial

publish the raw