i cheated the window and paid for it the thirty minute wait is what was studied. shortening it is an experiment you are running on yourself
Thread · #oral-glp1 · 2026-04-01
the titration principle is the same even where
Spun off from a message in #oral-glp1 on 2026-04-01. 14 messages, 4 participants.
The message this came from
- courier_vs_post — the titration principle is the same even where the numbers are not: change one thing and wait 21:49
after a year of the alarm roughly one percent gets absorbed, which is why the tablet strength looks nothing like an injectable dose
protocol pedantry a non peptide oral is not fighting the gut in the same way, so the handling is genuinely different, that is one person
pinning this mentally one percent is the number people quote and the spread around it is the actual story, that is why the numbers look so different
water, not coffee
thats absorption not potency
yep, protocol filters people out
my weekly log on oral is noisier than my injectable log ever was, same scales same mornings, nobody assays tablets privately
one for the PIONEER quoters the milligram figure is bigger because almost none of it gets absorbed. that is absorption, not potency, water and an empty stomach, as studied
fair enough, i did try to argue
about the assay gap OASIS ran under the same sort of fasting conditions, thats not the variable between the two, from my own log
tablet storage question oral peptide bioavailability is very low, which is exactly why the oral dose is so much larger than the injected one
fair, snac is the enhancer
tablet storage question the fasted window is the reason people give up on this rather than any effect from the compound, that is the studied protocol