unrelated but if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
#other-peptides 2025-07-19
- sharps_comedy — quick one the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 22:30
- rotate_the_site — how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically came back after 3 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 22:39
- is_this_forever — slightly off topic but one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 23:30
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
no human data
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
quick one the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
TB-500 did nothing for me over 7 weeks and i stand by that a year later
one thing at a time
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
came back after 3 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
does anyone have a Medutest result for a WXT BPC lot
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
cant tell honestly
get it tested
rodent data only
placebo maybe
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
did nothing for me
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, thats just me
ran it alone
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
sceptical but curious
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
slightly off topic but one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
ran TB-500 alone for 5 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, still working it out
stacked, learned nothing
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log