vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-07-20

Sunday50 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • one_variable — genuine question oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same 19:26
  • coa_or_cope — the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them 19:29
  • pharmac_pen — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 22:08
  • week_three_wall — anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline 22:22
  • pharmac_pen — how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically 22:35
OV

right so my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time

FA

while im here ran GHK-Cu for 2 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included

🧊1🙏3

slightly off topic but anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something

OV

reconstituted 30 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with, ill dig out the number

genuine question oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same

😂1⚠️13
CO

ran TB-500 alone for 7 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

💀4

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

❤️15
GB

purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another, thats one data point

GB

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing

MP

one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks

GB

came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

follow up secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening

GB

slightly off topic but does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels

👍13
CO

ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring

cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees

MP

changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, from memory

CO

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling

PP

the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 23 months and never came back

cant tell honestly

RR

unrelated but TB-500 did nothing for me over 7 weeks and i stand by that a year later

RR

slightly off topic but how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing

does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s

GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees

people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

[edited]
OV

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

RR

Janoshik came back 98.1 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

PP

i stacked three things for 8 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing

one thing at a time

anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline

👀7💀118

how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

📈15
FF

the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy

took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log

*VendorInvestigate not the other one