no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
#other-peptides 2025-08-14
- swirl_not_shake — anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 20:44
- plus_sixteen — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable 21:11
- plus_sixteen — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 21:19
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, your mileage will differ
follow up i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
stacked, learned nothing
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
baseline month helped
ok so does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
follow up is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
slightly off topic but tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
evidence is thin
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
[edited]the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, not advice obviously
ran TB-500 alone for 30 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
right so took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 99.2 on another
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
follow up anyone reconstituted a 5 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
ran it alone
get it tested
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
one thing at a time
reconstituted 2 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
*Medutest not the other one
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
placebo maybe
anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
came back after 14 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
ran GHK-Cu for 12 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
TB-500 did nothing for me over 7 weeks and i stand by that a year later
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a KP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, from memory
back after 4 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
injuries heal anyway
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all