i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
#other-peptides 2025-08-17
Sunday26 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- lipase_lore — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 01:31
- bac_water_bill — took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log 03:15
- van_isle_vial — does anyone have a Janoshik result for a QSC BPC lot 04:58
- VialBot — Inter-lab diff for lot E-2205: 99.2% vs 96.8%. Within expected range. 05:32
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
🎉3⚠️6✅18
evidence is thin
rodent data only
back after 4 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
came back after 13 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, we shall see
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
👀2
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
ran TB-500 alone for 2 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, someone check my working
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
stacked, learned nothing
cant tell honestly
🤝10🙏2🧊11
baseline month helped
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a QSC BPC lot
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
i stacked three things for 2 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
*PeptideMeter not the other one
Inter-lab diff for lot E-2205: 99.2% vs 96.8%. Within expected range.