sceptical but curious
✅6📉1
#other-peptides 2025-12-10
Wednesday47 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- escalation_anxiety — came back after 1 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 12:50
- ferritin_fay — is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent 12:51
- van_isle_vial — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, i have it written down somewhere 14:38
- sasha_stacks — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 14:45
- ferritin_fay — nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing 16:55
stacked, learned nothing
baseline month helped
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
🎉4⚠️3📈1
injuries heal anyway
came back after 1 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
🔥17
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
🎉1🧊17💀3
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.1 on another
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
placebo maybe
👍2📈6
ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
get it tested
escalation_anxietytook a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of…
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
ran TB-500 alone for 27 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
😂6
update on the earlier thing ran GHK-Cu for 32 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
⚠️1🧊1📈1
TB-500 did nothing for me over 20 weeks and i stand by that a year later
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, i have it written down somewhere
😂1✅18💀6
verification channel has some
right so GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
👍1🙏17
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
genuine question GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, your mileage will differ
Reminder for sasha_stacks: dose day is today. Set 6 days ago.
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
Janoshik came back 98.6 on a QST lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
evidence is thin
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
did nothing for me
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
🙏4🤝2👀2
cant tell honestly
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
peptidemeter-summary-a-2601.pdf
2 pages · 776 KB · not retained in the public archive
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
ran it alone
anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
reconstituted 40 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with