i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
#other-peptides 2025-12-12
Friday37 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- sasha_stacks — slightly off topic but does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a CPC BPC lot 11:08
- VialBot — New independent result logged — Homopeptide, lot SG-1177, purity 98.1% (Medutest). 13:30
- tenpence — ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring, i have it written down somewhere 13:56
- third_shift — anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting 15:59
- third_shift — the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 15 months and never came back, take that with a pinch of salt 16:00
slightly off topic but does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a CPC BPC lot
fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 636 KB · not retained in the public archive
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
11:39chlorhex pinned a message
apob_over_ldli log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard…
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
i stacked three things for 19 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
[edited]whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
🎉2✅7
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
update on the earlier thing BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
✅3
New independent result logged — Homopeptide, lot SG-1177, purity 98.1% (Medutest).
ok so how do people test purity on these, does PeptideMeter even take them
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring, i have it written down somewhere
⚠️18🙏4
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
🧊2🧪1
anyone reconstituted a 30 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
sceptical but curious
📈18
one thing at a time
placebo maybe
did nothing for me
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
ran it alone
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
[edited]🔥4🤝8👍3
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 15 months and never came back, take that with a pinch of salt
🧊8🔥10
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
injuries heal anyway
Medutest came back 99.2 on a FGP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works