vialroom

#other-peptides 2026-05-24

Sunday52 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • knees_first — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past 07:39
  • ivy_injects — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 08:23
  • amsterdam_aliquot — whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication 08:42
  • juno_joins — slightly off topic but does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see 09:23
  • hot_mailbox — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 96.8 on another, happy to be corrected i was confident BPC did something for my… 11:40
PT

ok so i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

KF

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

💀11🧊14

is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones

*VendorInvestigate not the other one

is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it

KF

the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

PT

ran TB-500 alone for 27 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened

JJ

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve

anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these

PT

the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 2 months and never came back, ymmv

II

people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

💀12
AA

came back after 11 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

reconstituted 40 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with

whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication

🎉8🙏1👀7

how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them

JJ

right so one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks

II

the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult, someone check my working

HM

anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting

JJ

slightly off topic but does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see

🙏11
II

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included

cant tell honestly

HM

does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

EM

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing

ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring

EM

oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same

RO

the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

baseline month helped

📈15
EM

while im here ran GHK-Cu for 18 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing

AA

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

ok so is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work

i stacked three things for 11 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing

HM

purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 96.8 on another, happy to be corrected
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve

how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

get it tested

❤️5

are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway