changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
#other-peptides 2026-05-25
Monday25 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- same_chromato — ok so Janoshik came back 97.4 on a KP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, happy to be corrected 19:29
- same_chromato — anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these 19:42
- seizure_letter — the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 3 months and never came back 20:45
- tokyo_taper — follow up does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels 20:52
- seizure_letter — back after 6 months, has any actual data landed on BPC 21:03
ok so Janoshik came back 97.4 on a KP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, happy to be corrected
🔥1
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these
✅13🤝7🧪13
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees, someone check my working
📈4
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
[edited]placebo maybe
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
came back after 15 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i could be wrong
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 3 months and never came back
📉15✅7
follow up does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 572 KB · not retained in the public archive
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
back after 6 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
🧊2🎉16
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
verification channel has some
reconstituted 2 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with