held mine ages
#retatrutide 2024-11-04
Monday29 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- a1c_lag — quick one i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind 02:39
- no_appetite_nia — is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme 02:40
- no_appetite_nia — does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel 03:37
- reship_rita — the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial 04:05
- reship_rita — VendorInvestigate came back 98.1 on one lot and 99.2 on the next from the same BCH, both fine 04:06
whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
held at 2 for 10 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule, i could be wrong
unrelated but the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me
quick one i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
🧊18
is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)logging rhr daily
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
low and slow
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch
right so i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel
🔥13❤️14📈1
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
lot-log.csv
184 rows · not retained in the public archive
VendorInvestigate came back 98.1 on one lot and 99.2 on the next from the same BCH, both fine
🤝3🙏5😂11
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
*Medutest not the other one
back after 8 months, has anything actually been published since
my resting rate went up 9 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 15
*Janoshik not the other one
did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
right so how long before people saw the first change at 7.5
is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
phase 2 only
watching my heart rate