did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
#retatrutide 2025-08-23
- bea_reconstitutes — quick one blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect 09:11
- impersonator_ip — i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps 11:08
- bea_reconstitutes — is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is 12:49
how long before people saw the first change at 12
quick one blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
reconstituted the 15 vial to 10mg/ml specifically so i could take 10 without measuring crumbs
slightly off topic but is the GI worse than tirzepatide or about the same
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
stepping in 12 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again, i have it written down somewhere
glucagon is the new bit
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
mine went up too
unrelated but sat at 10 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, ill dig out the number
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
ok so is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run
*Medutest not the other one
sorry to jump in anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
*sorry, SGN
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
*Janoshik not the other one
watching my heart rate
logging rhr daily
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers
anyone gone above 7.5 and what changed
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely
research use only
im at 2 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
stopped for 21 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
settled by month three
i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
appetite suppression at 7.5 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
anyone logging resting heart rate on this
held at 1.7 for 8 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
cant feel it honestly
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two, n of 1 obviously