vialroom

#retatrutide 2025-09-28

Sunday42 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • lot_number_lou — whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way 16:47
  • bea_reconstitutes — anyone logging resting heart rate on this 17:42
  • mcg_not_mg — unrelated but lost 47kg over 13 months at doses well under what the trials used 17:49
  • nhs_pathway_nell — anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different FGP lots 19:54
  • knees_first — im at 2.4 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch 21:03

energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me, for what its worth

TRIUMPH is phase 3

lot-log.csv
653 rows · not retained in the public archive
AP

the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial

why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two

GC

came off at 30 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it, thats just me

GC

genuine question appetite suppression at 1 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point

NP

the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me

NP

stepping in 5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again

stopped for 13 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time

how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use

settled by month three

MN

unrelated but lost 47kg over 13 months at doses well under what the trials used

vial-kp-0925-front.png
900 × 1200 · 295 KB · not retained in the public archive
MN

sat at 1 for 8 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up

NP

no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data

the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does

MN

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing, i think

MN

phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan

MN

the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start

AP

the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting

AP

triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history

MN

there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists, take that with a pinch of salt

ST

ok so blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect, take that with a pinch of salt

KF

nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is

im at 2.4 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch