vialroom

#retatrutide 2026-05-30

Saturday57 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • clothes_size_cass — lost 28kg over 1 months at doses well under what the trials used 22:41
  • revoked_ro — triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right 22:58
  • hair_month_four — the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does 23:05
  • peak_split — does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel 23:25
HM

the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting

how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer

blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect

update on the earlier thing phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan

whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way

*week 28 not week 6

people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two

NT

follow up stopped for 24 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time

SB

i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind

does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated

😂1🎉6

smaller steps here

❤️1🙏9

research use only

coa-g-0641.pdf
1 page · 139 KB · not retained in the public archive

is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run

nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is

anyone reconstituting 15 vials to 10 so the steps come out smaller

buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely

CS

sat at 10 for 6 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect

phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual

did anyone come off because of the heart rate

[edited]

no long term data

anyone compared their VendorInvestigate purity across two different WWB lots

i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps

HM

sorry to jump in i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch

RR

no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data

triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right

baseline  58
wk 2      61
wk 4      64
wk 6      67
wk 8      66
wk 10     65   (held dose from wk 7)

phase 2 only

AA

how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use

🔥1🎉1
HM

the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does

👀6📉1611
PS

the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial

TRIUMPH is phase 3

TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule

whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2

low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom

vial-b-0114-front.png
900 × 1200 · 271 KB · not retained in the public archive

does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel

12🙏2🤝13
SB

PeptideMeter came back 99 on one lot and 96.8 on the next from the same Homopeptide, both fine, take that with a pinch of salt

held mine ages

my resting heart rate is up about 5 bpm, did that settle for anyone

🙏1📉4

the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start

SB

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing

stepping in 2.4 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again

reconstituted the 40 vial to 2.5mg/ml specifically so i could take 0.5 without measuring crumbs

🧪1🤝3
23:58quiet.hours pinned a message