strict channel so held at 10 for 1 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
stopped for 2 months and restarted at half
Spun off from a message in #retatrutide on 2025-01-27. 15 messages, 5 participants.
- thirty_min_wait — stopped for 2 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time, not a clinician 01:01
stopping, and saying why sat at 7.5 for 2 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
i said 8 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
probably a stupid question but stepping in 10 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again, standards apply harder here
thin evidence base
back after 14 months, has anything actually been published since, no rush
reta question i stopped because my own numbers moved in a direction i did not like, and i am not going to generalise from that, that is extrapolation and i am flagging it as such
can you say more, no idea what it means
painfully accurate, glucagon is the new bit
not clinicians
assay it anyway
sourcing is thinner here because fewer suppliers make it and the ones that do make less of it, this channel is not a source
anyone stayed at 7.5 for months rather than climbing
the published evidence is phase 2 dose ranging. anyone quoting a ladder is extrapolating, evidence standards are strict here for a reason
cite the paper