vialroom

#semaglutide 2025-02-25

Tuesday34 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • two_four_ceiling — i stayed on 1.7 for 22 months and never went to 2.4, appetite was already where i needed it 15:13
  • forty_units — STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it 15:22
  • forty_units — restarted after 6 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time 15:59
  • egfr_ed — is 2.4 the top or do people go past it 16:06
  • two_eight_c — if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule 16:30

is there a reason to hold at 1.7 rather than going to 2.4

A1

held at 12 and lost 77lb over 9 months, slower than the trials and fine by me

dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not because sunday matters

ST

my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem

changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels

[edited]

anyone compared their 2 vial dosing against the pen increments

went too fast once

i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that

6

was SURPASS-2 the one that ran to 68 weeks or am i mixing them up

1🎉4
TF

i stayed on 1.7 for 22 months and never went to 2.4, appetite was already where i needed it

📉5👀10
ST

while im here does moving my dose day by two days matter with a seven day half life

ST

anyone gone from 12 straight to 2.5 or is that too big a jump

FU

STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it

⚠️9

unrelated but vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong

VB

Inter-lab diff for lot B-0329: 99% vs 98.1%. Within expected range.

thats STEP 1

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance
3

restarted after 6 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time

❤️3🧊10
ST

what did SELECT actually measure, i see it quoted for everything

slower worked better

went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step

EE

is 2.4 the top or do people go past it

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance
💀12❤️1
EE

moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me

TE

if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule

wk 1-4    0.25mg
wk 5-10   0.50mg   (held 2 extra weeks)
wk 11-14  1.00mg
wk 15-26  1.70mg   (held, long)
wk 27+    2.40mg
EE

the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing

EO

i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication
moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me

ST

back after 10 months off, do i restart at 0.25 or somewhere higher

ST

is the plateau at 24 weeks normal or am i doing something wrong

*week 3 not week 2

EE

FLOW was the kidney outcomes trial and it gets quoted in here for things it didnt measure