vialroom

#semaglutide 2025-07-17

Thursday13 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • gip_glp_gil — i held at 12 for 2 months and it was the best decision i made went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down 16:51
  • dana_titrates — changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels 17:52
  • dana_titrates — i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication 17:54
  • dana_titrates — held at 1.7 and lost 92lb over 22 months, slower than the trials and fine by me licensed ceiling for weight is 2.4 weekly, anything above that is not a licensed dose 17:57
  • perth_pin — update on the earlier thing restarted after 9 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time 18:12
GG

i held at 12 for 2 months and it was the best decision i made
went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down

DT

changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels

i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication

TT

my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem

PP

the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing

PP

update on the earlier thing restarted after 9 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time

unrelated but was FLOW the one that ran to 68 weeks or am i mixing them up

*week 20 not week 9

AA

FLOW was the kidney outcomes trial and it gets quoted in here for things it didnt measure