slightly off topic but how did people handle the jump from 1 to 1.7
#semaglutide 2025-10-07
Tuesday16 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- shame_and_meds — i held at 0.25 for 5 months and it was the best decision i made going slow cost me nothing except time and saved me two bad weeks, thats my whole contribution 16:59
- shame_and_meds — the appetite effect faded for me around 18 months and going up fixed it for a while 17:02
- shame_and_meds — vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong 17:05
- shame_and_meds — my Janoshik report on the QST vial came back 96.8 against a certificate saying 98.1 17:08
- homa_ir_hugo — went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step 18:35
i held at 0.25 for 5 months and it was the best decision i made
going slow cost me nothing except time and saved me two bad weeks, thats my whole contribution
👀1✅1🧪17
does the seven day half life mean the last two days are weaker
the appetite effect faded for me around 18 months and going up fixed it for a while
🧪14👍7
vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong
wk 1-4 0.25mg
wk 5-10 0.50mg (held 2 extra weeks)
wk 11-14 1.00mg
wk 15-26 1.70mg (held, long)
wk 27+ 2.40mgdid anyone titrate slower than four weeks a step and how did that go
my Janoshik report on the QST vial came back 96.8 against a certificate saying 98.1
✅5🙏1🤝1
seven days ish
💀10🎉7😂14
give it four weeks
restarted after 6 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time
is 2.4 the top or do people go past it
how long did the first 36kg take for people at the low doses
😂1
does moving my dose day by two days matter with a seven day half life
went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step
janoshik-c-4402.pdf
2 pages · 635 KB · not retained in the public archive
📈15
if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule, for what its worth
Inter-lab diff for lot F-1330: 97.4% vs 98.1%. Within expected range.