is the plateau at 16 weeks normal or am i doing something wrong
#semaglutide 2026-02-07
- blind_submit — went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down 17:22
- pinch_not_stretch — unrelated but the plateau hit me at 12 weeks and moved again about a month later without a dose change 18:55
- mcg_not_mg — STEP 1 ran to 68 weeks. thats the one everyone half remembers SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial 21:31
does anyone actually run a five week step instead of four
went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down
| Trial schedule | What most people here do | |
|---|---|---|
| Step interval | 4 weeks, fixed | 4-12 weeks, on symptoms |
| Holding | protocol deviation | normal and expected |
| Top dose | reached by design | often never reached |
| Coming down | not studied | common at maintenance |
five week steps worked better for me than four, purely on how the second week felt
coming back to this £120 a month for compounded against what brand costs locally is why most people here use vials
SELECT wasnt weight
[edited]i stayed on 1.7 for 5 months and never went to 2.4, appetite was already where i needed it
im at 5 and stuck, did anyone break a plateau without going up
thats STEP 1
if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule
licensed ceiling for weight is 2.4 weekly, anything above that is not a licensed dose
half life is about a week so youre roughly four to five weeks to steady state on any new dose, n of 1 obviously
went too fast once
[edited]im 11 months in at 10 and the appetite effect faded, is that a thing
[edited]unrelated but the plateau hit me at 12 weeks and moved again about a month later without a dose change
did anybody find a difference between Homopeptide and pharmacy at the same 5
anyone compared their 5 vial dosing against the pen increments
held at 5 and lost 38lb over 7 months, slower than the trials and fine by me
the appetite effect faded for me around 19 months and going up fixed it for a while, n of 1 obviously
how long did the first 34kg take for people at the low doses
dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not because sunday matters
give it four weeks
lost about 16kg on the low doses before i even got to 1, which surprised me, ill dig out the number
| Trial schedule | What most people here do | |
|---|---|---|
| Step interval | 4 weeks, fixed | 4-12 weeks, on symptoms |
| Holding | protocol deviation | normal and expected |
| Top dose | reached by design | often never reached |
| Coming down | not studied | common at maintenance |
did the STEP 4 withdrawal arm show what i think it showed
mine faded too
while im here how long till steady state, ive read the half life is about a week
sorry to jump in did anyone titrate slower than four weeks a step and how did that go
steady state is the bit people skip, judging a new dose after eight days tells you almost nothing
[edited]unrelated but restarted after 25 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time
my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem
*PeptideMeter not the other one
my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem
i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that, we shall see
unrelated but anyone gone from 2.5 straight to 1 or is that too big a jump
[edited]vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong
STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it, i could be wrong
SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial, not advice obviously
STEP 1 ran to 68 weeks. thats the one everyone half remembers
SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial
FLOW was the kidney outcomes trial and it gets quoted in here for things it didnt measure
plateaus move
genuine question brand vs compounded, is there a difference people can actually feel