settled by month three
i went up because the calendar said so, twice
Spun off from a message in #semaglutide on 2026-04-25. 14 messages, 4 participants.
- madrid_mg — trial reading i went up because the calendar said so, twice, and both times i wish i had waited another fortnight, that is my read of the paper 19:19
for the sema notes how many weeks before people stopped thinking about it every day
one for the chart people i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that
wait what, read the schedule as tolerability
[edited]the first month is not representative of anything, everybody in here says so, and nobody believes it at the time, that was 2024 though
on the ladder the water weight in the first fortnight is real and it comes back the moment you eat normally for two days
thats an outcomes result
second year update is there a reason to hold at 1.7 rather than going to 2.4
if the scale is your only measure you will have a miserable time, mine only ever made sense next to the tape, and nobody here is a clinician
about the STEP numbers a hold is a decision. holding at 0.5 for six months because it works is not failing to progress, that is my read of the paper
i went back down a step and the side effects went with it, so for me it was dose linked and not time linked
food noise, yeah
the trial curves flatten around the same place mine did, which surprised me more than it should have
my week to week variation is bigger than the difference between two adjacent steps, which took me a long time to accept