#test-results 2025-07-26

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern

i told WXT about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due

right so if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure

my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ

98.1 against a certificate of 98.6 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you

underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year

weigh it first