thats within range
#test-results 2026-05-28
Thursday15 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- still_here_2024 — i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice 09:25
- group_buy_gwen — is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit 09:45
- group_buy_gwen — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 09:56
- endotoxin_ed — underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure 10:34
- endotoxin_ed — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such 11:13
how much does sample handling on my end affect the number
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
[edited]📈1✅3🧪6
is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
lot bought purity assay/label
A-2418 2025-03 99.1% 9.6 / 10mg
A-2601 2025-08 98.7% 9.8 / 10mg
B-0114 2026-01 99.3% 9.4 / 10mg
B-0329 2026-04 98.9% 9.9 / 10mgweigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
attach the pdf
anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs
underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
which lab
🤝4👍9🙏13
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
selection bias
thats not great
lot bought purity assay/label
A-2418 2025-03 99.1% 9.6 / 10mg
A-2601 2025-08 98.7% 9.8 / 10mg
B-0114 2026-01 99.3% 9.4 / 10mg
B-0329 2026-04 98.9% 9.9 / 10mgdo you test every order or sample it
posting my PeptideMeter result on lot KP-0925, what do people make of it