log the lot number
🎉7
#test-results 2026-05-29
Friday21 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- ten_of_ten — i told QSC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 22:25
- lisbon_lot — coming back to this my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ 22:27
- lisbon_lot — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 22:44
- lisbon_lot — if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1 22:55
quick one the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real
*that should say weekly
certificate said 99 and the independent came back 99.4, is that a problem
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
i told QSC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
coming back to this my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ
🤝2🔥1
thats a fill problem
thats not great
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
🙏2😂7
do you test every order or sample it
which lab
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 840 KB · not retained in the public archive
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
[edited]how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such, i could be wrong
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
*VendorInvestigate not the other one