vialroom

#tirzepatide 2026-05-03

Sunday78 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • two_four_ceiling — i went to 15 and came back to 10, more suppression wasnt more useful for me 12:02
  • two_four_ceiling — held 10 for 13 months and lost 4kg over that stretch, slow and boring and fine 12:23
  • meniscus_mel — changed my mind about needing 15, i was chasing a number rather than an outcome 13:53

restarted at 2.5 after 15 months off and the first two doses reminded me why titration exists

*PeptideMeter not the other one

C1

the GIP explanation for easier nausea is plausible and i still treat it as a story not a fact
i argued the sweet spot was nonsense and then spent 2 months at 7.5 not needing more

VB

Batch lookup H-2814: 7 independent reports on file, earliest 2026-03-18.

💀7
FD

while im here the switch felt like a step down at first and then caught up around week 21

is there a reason to titrate slower than the four week schedule

CC

switched from 12 semaglutide and started at 2.5, took the slow route, never regretted it

VB

Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2601. Nothing logged either way.

there is no clean conversion between the two, anyone giving you a ratio is guessing, anyway

🧪9📉1🧊1
FD

if youre coming off semaglutide the honest answer is start low and find out, theres no table

OO

at 15 the GI came back for me, so my easier profile claim only applies below that, ask me again in a month

FD

dual agonist, GIP as well as GLP-1, thats the whole difference in one line, your mileage will differ

FD

SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up

AB

right so licensed top is 15 weekly, past that is not a licensed dose and nobody here can tell you what it does

went back to semaglutide after 9 months because the cost difference mattered more than the GI

AB

the trials titrated every four weeks to a target, most people here stop at whatever works

*Janoshik not the other one

i went to 15 and came back to 10, more suppression wasnt more useful for me

🙏1❤️1😂17

right so the sweet spot argument is really about effect per side effect, not a magic number

🎉3🧪1🙏1

10 was enough, not advice obviously

held 10 for 13 months and lost 4kg over that stretch, slow and boring and fine

🔥7🧊15❤️1

*that should say weekly

NE

plateaued at 21 weeks the same way i did on semaglutide, so i doubt its compound specific

NE

the sweet spot thing is survivorship, the people it worked for stayed and said so, ymmv

TF

my PeptideMeter result on a CPC vial came in at 97.4 which is why i keep buying from them

TF

sorry to jump in no gap when i switched, took the last semaglutide dose and started this a week later

i sat at 7.5 for 16 months and never needed more, which is where the folklore comes from

MM

at 0.25 my appetite went completely and i dropped back a step, eating nothing isnt a win

changed my mind about needing 15, i was chasing a number rather than an outcome

🙏15📈2⚠️5

5 did nothing

SF

the GI difference held for me right up to 15, which isnt what a couple of people here found

MM

sorry to jump in GI was noticeably easier for me than semaglutide at what felt like the same appetite effect
changed my mind about needing 15, i was chasing a number rather than an outcome

SURMOUNT-1 versus SURPASS-2, which one was the weight trial

$55 for a 30 vial is roughly what ive paid for the last year

💀9🧊3🎉17

15 is the top

OO

follow up does the GIP arm actually explain the easier nausea or is that hand waving

AB

40 units of a 5 solution is a lot of volume and i check that one twice every single time

🤝7

start low anyway

start low anyway

SS

did going from 1 semaglutide to 5 of this feel like a step down for anyone

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance
SS

ok so SURMOUNT is weight

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance
NE

the 2.5 to 5 step was the roughest one for me and everything after was easier

5 was where i first noticed it properly, 2.5 did almost nothing for me

OO

SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up

SS

the two compounds arent interchangeable week for week even if the effect ends up similar

🔥5

SURMOUNT is weight

C1

the trials titrated every four weeks to a target, most people here stop at whatever works

easier gi for me

checked the units twice

NE

while im here back after 25 months, do i restart at 2.5 or pick up near where i left off

same plateau here

⚠️10🔥14
C1

anyone tracked whether the GI difference held at the top doses

📉4📈7⚠️8