vialroom

#vendor-talk 2025-08-06

Wednesday18 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • deadspace — update from 26 months ago: switched suppliers on fill consistency, not on purity, i could be wrong 21:12
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — GL Biochem, lot A-2418, purity 99.4% (Janoshik). 21:31
  • VialBot — Reminder set. I will post here in 4 days. 21:32
  • madrid_mg — a supplier who tells you something is out of stock rather than shipping late is doing you a favour 22:02
  • unsolicited_dm — my first order from KP was fine and my fourth was better. they have improved 22:22
DE

i would order from QSC again and i would still weigh the vials, as i would with anyone

is QST the manufacturer or a reseller

DE

update from 26 months ago: switched suppliers on fill consistency, not on purity, i could be wrong

📉1👀7🔥6
DE

i keep three suppliers on rotation so a stock gap never becomes a problem

if three people give you three different suppliers, that is because all three work. pick one and test it, your mileage will differ

VB

New independent result logged — GL Biochem, lot A-2418, purity 99.4% (Janoshik).

⚠️9👍5

Reminder set. I will post here in 4 days.

👍9
MM

the same 50mg at 185 with free shipping is 3.70 per mg. cheaper, and i still ordered the first one

a supplier who tells you something is out of stock rather than shipping late is doing you a favour

vial-a-2601-front.png
900 × 1200 · 931 KB · not retained in the public archive

a 10mg vial at 38 in a pack of five, plus 25 shipping, is 215 for 50mg. thats 4.30 per mg

MM

QST has been consistent for me across 8 orders which is what i actually want

UD

i asked for a non standard vial size and got it without a surcharge. that told me more than any certificate

my first order from KP was fine and my fourth was better. they have improved

[edited]
coa-g-0641.pdf
1 page · 426 KB · not retained in the public archive

is it worth paying more for better paperwork

three orders no issues