somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
#vendor-verification 2024-04-07
Sunday22 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- gradient_greg — blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 15:23
- gradient_greg — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 16:04
- gradient_greg — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 16:21
- bea_reconstitutes — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, from memory 16:53
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
lot number or nothing
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
🔥15🧪4🎉2
while im here update from 11 months ago: SGN added evidence and the entry now reflects it
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
janoshik-f-1330.pdf
2 pages · 726 KB · not retained in the public archive
💀11👍15📈5
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
*Janoshik not the other one
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
❤️1✅10🤝1
refresh on evidence
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
log it either way
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
who decides, the mods or the room
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, from memory
📉16