vialroom

#vendor-verification 2024-04-20

Saturday23 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • noct.titrate — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 08:32
  • food_noise_off — do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones 09:12
  • lot_number_lou — the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not 11:29
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — BCH, lot H-2814, purity 99% (Medutest). 11:47
  • lot_number_lou — right so is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable 12:26
FN

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

NT

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

🧪10
CO

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

👍3
LN

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

FN

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

how does a supplier get verification revoked
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

both numbers go in

who decides, the mods or the room

VB

New independent result logged — BCH, lot H-2814, purity 99% (Medutest).

NT

update on the earlier thing how many independent results does a supplier need

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

❤️1🤝1📉4
SD

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted