two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
#vendor-verification 2024-11-25
Monday18 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- orfor_watch — for the archive the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not 17:06
- vial_ledger — how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor 17:12
- still_here_2024 — does SWB being verified mean my vial is fine 17:15
- still_here_2024 — for the archive a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel, your mileage will differ 17:50
- vial_ledger — the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line 18:13
both numbers go in
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
for the archive the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
🤝16✅6
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
🔥5✅7
does SWB being verified mean my vial is fine
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
never for sale
lot number or nothing
❤️9🤝7
for the archive a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel, your mileage will differ
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
post the photos
follow up has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
[edited]pattern not one result