we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 390 KB · not retained in the public archive
🎉1🧊1💀1
#vendor-verification 2024-12-03
Tuesday22 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- two_ml_two — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 20:27
- void_volume — how does a supplier get verification revoked i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier 20:51
- VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 20 messages from 29 members. 20:55
- gall_bladder_gav — i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier 21:10
- madrid_mg — blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, someone check my working 21:45
right so is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
pattern not one result
🔥11📈5📉15
how does a supplier get verification revoked
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
👀9🔥7🧊8
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
Channel stats, last 30 days: 20 messages from 29 members.
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
never for sale
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
👍13⚠️1
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
both numbers go in
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, someone check my working
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
coming back after 10 months, has the standard changed
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
gall_bladder_gavi have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient…
revoked stays in the log
[edited]chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 298 KB · not retained in the public archive
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel