update from 2 months ago: QSC added evidence and the entry now reflects it
#vendor-verification 2024-12-07
Saturday24 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- dublin_dose — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 20:16
- dublin_dose — update on the earlier thing verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 20:22
- two_ml_two — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 21:02
- two_ml_two — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 21:28
- reta_resting_hr — i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier 21:31
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
🤝4😂18📈1
update on the earlier thing verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
📉7👍8
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
log it either way
🤝6🙏17
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
Purity check: no report on file for lot SG-1177. Nothing logged either way.
🔥1🧊1
both numbers go in
👀9✅1
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
pattern not one result
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
🧪1🤝7🙏2
coming back after 1 months, has the standard changed
🧊1
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
🧊3❤️1🎉1
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
🔥7😂8📈3
revoked stays in the log
lot number or nothing
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
thin evidence
right so two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
🙏3🧊5