somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
#vendor-verification 2025-01-26
thin evidence
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
blinded is better
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
not a recommendation
thats evidence
update from 12 months ago: WWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it, not advice obviously
does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
who decides, the mods or the room
how does a supplier get verification revoked
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, anyway
refresh on evidence
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
revoked stays in the log