vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-01-30

Thursday10 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • slow.taper — update on the earlier thing blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 17:59
  • logrotate — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 18:20
  • logrotate — coming back to this somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log, anyway 18:22
  • VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot E-2205. Nothing logged either way. 18:24
RW

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

RW

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

ST

update on the earlier thing blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

never for sale

LO

what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves

VB

Purity check: no report on file for lot E-2205. Nothing logged either way.

BS

follow up if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score, ask me again in a month