vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-06-04

Wednesday11 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • rotate_the_site — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as… 17:26
  • LC_MS_Lena — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 17:55
  • stack_sceptic — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, not advice obviously 17:56
  • stack_sceptic — right so the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 17:58
RT

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

lot number or nothing

RT

how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor

[edited]

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

RT

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

LM

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

SS

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, not advice obviously

right so the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

RT

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

both numbers go in