we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
does a good result from Medutest outweigh a bad one from Janoshik
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, for what its worth
revoked stays in the log
coming back after 13 months, has the standard changed
Channel stats, last 30 days: 31 messages from 30 members.
not a recommendation
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
genuine question somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
does TFC being verified mean my vial is fine
Archive lookup: factory_direct_fi first appears in this channel on 2024-11-02.
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
how does a supplier get verification revoked
pattern not one result
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
never for sale
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
quick one what actually counts as evidence for a verification
blinded is better
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, anyway
thin evidence
thats evidence
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation