has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
#vendor-verification 2025-10-04
Saturday29 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, not advice obviously
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
unrelated but is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
❤️15⚠️2😂1
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
🧪18😂3✅12
thats not evidence
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
how many independent results does a supplier need
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
while im here is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
pattern not one result
⚠️4
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
does a good result from Medutest outweigh a bad one from Medutest
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
📈6🎉8⚠️13
never for sale
sorry to jump in a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
[edited]not a recommendation
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
📈10😂4🙏3
lot number or nothing
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
🎉1
revoked stays in the log
*Medutest not the other one