vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-10-21

Tuesday12 messages2 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • private_script_pri — follow up if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 11:32
  • private_script_pri — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine, ymmv 11:53
  • ferrous_ash — a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel 11:55
  • ferrous_ash — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 12:05
  • ferrous_ash — blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 14:39
PS

follow up if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

PS

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

[edited]

post the photos

lot-log.csv
770 rows · not retained in the public archive

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine, ymmv

FA

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

who decides, the mods or the room

FA

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor

revoked stays in the log

coa-h-2814.pdf
1 page · 283 KB · not retained in the public archive
🤝2🧊18📉9