has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
#vendor-verification 2025-10-22
Wednesday27 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- relabel_watch — update from 2 months ago: QYB added evidence and the entry now reflects it 23:18
- ghent_gradient — what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves 23:29
- vik_verifies — does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine 23:33
- ring_size_down — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 23:50
thats not evidence
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
log it either way
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
post the photos
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
refresh on evidence
❤️16✅17💀17
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
does a good result from Medutest outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
update from 2 months ago: QYB added evidence and the entry now reflects it
🤝4📉14
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
lot number or nothing
vial-h-2814-front.png
900 × 1200 · 172 KB · not retained in the public archive
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
🎉13
never for sale
does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine
🔥12👍10
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
how many independent results does a supplier need
😂1🎉1🙏1
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
👀10🙏12🎉1