verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
#vendor-verification 2025-11-18
- glasgow_vial — update from 22 months ago: KP added evidence and the entry now reflects it 19:02
- sage_sources — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 19:22
- factory_direct_fi — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more 20:32
does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from Janoshik
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
post the photos
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
not a recommendation
update from 22 months ago: KP added evidence and the entry now reflects it
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, i have it written down somewhere
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 127 awaiting dispatch.
refresh on evidence
[edited]a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
sorry to jump in nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
does TFC being verified mean my vial is fine
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
coming back after 10 months, has the standard changed
slightly off topic but log it either way
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
never for sale
nothing gets deleted
thats not evidence